This article is for anyone planning to publish an AI-made manuscript, illustrations, cover, or a photo book of AI-generated people on Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP), or who has received a notice that a book was removed or an account suspended. It walks through how KDP treats AI content, five checkpoints to clear before publishing, points to watch for with AI-model photo books, how to respond depending on the type of notice you receive, and the order for rebuilding in line with the Terms.
KDP's AI Content Policy: Not a Ban, But a Disclosure Requirement
Under the "Artificial Intelligence (AI) Content" section of KDP's content guidelines, publishing AI-generated content is not itself prohibited. What's required is that, when you publish a new book or edit and republish an existing one, you tell Amazon (disclose) if it contains AI-generated content — text, images, or translations.
This article is based on KDP's Help pages, the Kindle Direct Publishing Terms and Conditions ("KDP Terms"), and published materials from Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, all as of September 2026. Terms and on-screen details can change, so confirm the latest guidance before you publish or file an appeal. Note that KDP is a separate service from your selling account (Seller Central), with its own separate Terms. For a general walkthrough of how to check a suspension, see Responding to a KDP account suspension.
Where to draw the line between "AI-generated" and "AI-assisted"
| Category | KDP's description (summary) | Disclosure required |
|---|---|---|
| AI-generated | Text, images, or translations created using an AI-based tool. If AI actually created the content, it is still considered "AI-generated" even if you later edit it extensively | Yes |
| AI-assisted | Content you created yourself, then edited, polished, or checked for errors using an AI-based tool. This also covers cases where you used AI to brainstorm ideas but wrote the final text or created the final images yourself | No |
The case that's easy to get wrong is when you've heavily edited an AI draft. It helps to base the decision not on "how much you changed" but on "who created the text or image in the first place — AI or you."

Using AI doesn't excuse you from responsibility
Whether content is AI-generated or AI-assisted, KDP states that the publisher is responsible for confirming it complies with all of the content guidelines, including intellectual property rights. That said, what consequences follow from failing to disclose AI-generated content, and how Amazon verifies AI use, are not disclosed in public information.
Break each book into parts to decide what needs to be disclosed
You might write the text yourself but create only the cover art with AI — the production method can differ part by part. Deciding whether disclosure is needed on a part-by-part basis helps you avoid missing anything.
| Part | Example that counts as AI-generated | Example that counts as AI-assisted | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manuscript | Had AI write the body of a chapter, then polished it | Used AI to check typos or wording in your own manuscript | Even if you rewrite what AI wrote, it's still AI-generated |
| Illustrations/photos | Illustrations or portraits created with an image-generation AI | Retouched with AI a photo you took or an image you drew yourself | The guidelines explicitly state images are subject to disclosure |
| Cover | Artwork or a photo for the cover generated with AI | Fine-tuned your own design with AI | There's no cover-specific rule — check disclosure requirements based on it being an image in the book |
| Translation | Had AI translate the original text, then revised it | Used AI to check for errors in your own translation | The guidelines explicitly state translations are subject to disclosure |
Some edits are harder to judge — for example, using AI to significantly add a person or background to a photo you took yourself. Write out which parts AI created, check them against the Help explanations, and contact KDP directly if you're still unsure.
A "creation log" as the basis for your decisions and explanations
The Copyright Division of Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, in its "AI and Copyright Checklist and Guidance" (July 31, 2024), recommends keeping records of the generation process — including prompts — so you can show a work doesn't rely on an existing one. For KDP, too, it helps to prepare a "creation log" for each book: it gives you a basis for your disclosure decisions, and it's a handy record for organizing the facts if you need to verify rights or file an appeal. (Whether the log itself would be accepted as a submitted document isn't stated in public information.)
Items worth recording in your creation log
- The production method for each part (chapter, illustration number, cover, translated text, etc.) and whether it's AI-generated or AI-assisted
- The name of the AI service you used, and a copy of its terms of service as of when you used it
- The date of generation and the key points of the prompt (whether you included proper nouns such as titles or names of real people)
- The source and usage terms of any reference material, and the extent of any human additions or edits
- The date of publication or republication, and what you disclosed at that time
Five checkpoints to clear before publishing
Besides the AI section, the guidelines set out separate sections such as "Illegal or Infringing Content," "Offensive Content," and books that compromise the reader's experience — and each must be satisfied independently of whether AI was used. Before you publish, check the following five checkpoints in order.
Checkpoint 1. Rights: being able to generate it isn't the same as being allowed to sell it
The guidelines require the publisher to confirm that content doesn't violate the law and doesn't infringe copyright, trademark, branding, privacy, publicity rights, or other rights. The copyright guidelines also state explicitly that submitting content you don't have the rights to can lead to the book being rejected or removed, the account being suspended, and royalties being forfeited.
In Japan, the "Approach to AI and Copyright" published on March 15, 2024 by the Legal System Subcommittee of the Copyright Subdivision, Council for Cultural Affairs, is a useful reference. The document explicitly states it has no legal binding force, but here are the points worth understanding before you sell:
- Publishing or selling AI-generated work is judged by the same standard as ordinary copyright infringement. If both "similarity" and "reliance" on an existing work are found, and no exception applies, it constitutes infringement
- If an existing work is included in the AI's training data, reliance is normally presumed even if the user didn't know about that work. Entering the work itself, or proper nouns such as its title or character names, into a prompt is considered likely to make a finding of reliance more likely
- Even if you can generate output resembling an existing work without permission as long as it stays within private use, "using" it — distributing it or transferring copies, for example — often falls outside the scope of the exceptions, so you need to check for infringement before using it
Note that "whether a book you made with AI becomes your own copyrighted work" is a separate question from infringement. The same document suggests that output generated from a simple instruction alone is unlikely to qualify as a copyrighted work, while a "creative contribution" — shown through the specificity of your instructions or through your own additions and edits — can make it one. Even so, a work recognized as your own can still infringe if it's similar to, and relies on, an existing work.
The checklist mentioned above also recommends following the AI service's own terms of use and, before using output, checking whether it resembles an existing work through text or image search. For a decision on your specific situation, consult a lawyer or other qualified professional. For help organizing similarity and permission issues, Responding to Amazon copyright complaints, written for selling accounts, is also a useful reference.
Checkpoint 2. Disclosure: AI disclosure, metadata, and Primary Audience
Disclose AI-generated content during the publishing or republishing process, following the classification you settled on in your creation log. Here are the main examples that aren't allowed in your book's details (metadata):
- Using another work's title, an author's name, or a registered trademark in your title without permission
- Including ranking claims such as "bestseller," promotional language such as "free," or repeated generic keywords in your title or subtitle
- Putting another author's name or terms unrelated to the content in your keywords
- Choosing a category that would mislead readers
- Including contact information, reviews or endorsements, requests for reviews, or time-limited information in your book description
If your cover or text contains sexually explicit images, or your title contains sexually explicit language, you must select "Yes" for Primary Audience (主な対象読者), and the book becomes ineligible for children's categories. Books that don't follow the Metadata Guidelines are removed, and books that might not be following them are subject to investigation.
Checkpoint 3. Quality: does the content meet readers' expectations?
The "Kindle content quality guide" lists examples that disappoint readers: content that's freely available on the web, content whose main purpose is promotion, poor-quality translations, and content that's too short, among others.
Manuscripts made with AI tend to retain factual errors, repetition across chapters, a mismatch between the description and the actual content, and unnatural translated wording, so have a person read the entire text. A book judged to have enough quality problems to harm the reading experience may be taken off sale until it's fixed. The quality guide also states that Amazon may take action against accounts that repeatedly add inappropriate content, and that in the worst case this can include account suspension.
Checkpoint 4. Mass production and similar titles: don't stack up books from the same template
AI makes it easy to produce many books with a similar structure, but there can be limits on creating a large number of titles in a short period. The quality guide also lists content that's not meaningfully different from other books in the Kindle Store, and content where the same material is reused or repeated across multiple books, as examples that don't meet reader expectations. Before publishing each book, make sure you can explain how it differs from your existing titles and what value it offers readers.
Be careful, too, if you use AI to translate a classic whose copyright has expired. For a public-domain work that already has a free edition available, you can only publish a differentiated edition — one that includes, for example, an original translation, original annotations, or at least 10 original illustrations — and your title needs a notation such as "(translated edition)." Before publishing, check the latest KDP Help to see whether an AI translation qualifies as this kind of translated edition, and if it's still unclear, ask KDP. Translation quality also relates to Checkpoint 3, so have a person check the entire translated text.
Checkpoint 5. Account: one account per person, with accurate registration information
KDP Terms Section 4.2 requires you to keep your registration information (name, address, payment details, etc.) accurate and current, and states that you may hold only one account at a time. Don't create separate accounts for different genres or pen names.
Final checklist before publishing
- You've settled the AI-generated/AI-assisted classification for each part in your creation log
- You've recorded the AI service's terms of use and the results of your similarity check
- Your prompts, title, and keywords don't include the names of real works or real people
- You've reflected the presence or absence of sexually explicit images or language in your Primary Audience setting
- A person has read the entire book and fixed errors, repetition, and any mismatch with the description
- The content and structure don't overlap with your existing titles, and you can explain this book's unique value
- Your registration information is current, and you hold only one KDP account
What to watch for with AI-model photo books
Photo books built around AI-generated images of people (so-called "AI gravure" and similar) are an area with many things to check, on both the content and the rights side.
| Risk | Related rule | How to check |
|---|---|---|
| Degree of sexual content | "Offensive Content"; disclosure under Primary Audience | If there's explicit imagery or language, disclose it correctly |
| A person who appears to be a minor | "Offensive Content" (the Japanese version reads "content containing child pornography"; the English version explicitly also covers content that promotes the abuse or sexual exploitation of children, or that glorifies pedophilia) | Don't use images that sexualize a youthful-looking person |
| Generating a likeness of a real person, or using a real name | The prohibition on violating publicity and privacy rights; the Metadata Guidelines | Don't prompt for a specific person's likeness, and don't use an image that ends up resembling someone. Don't try to attract searches using a real name |
| Generation using someone else's photo as input | The Agency for Cultural Affairs checklist (using an existing image as input to create something similar can require permission) | Don't use a photo you don't have permission for as input material |
| Mass-producing photo books with a similar format | The quality guide (content that doesn't meet reader expectations: content not meaningfully different from other books, the same content reused across multiple books, etc.) | Check whether the composition and structure overlap with your existing titles |
The wording of "Offensive Content" differs between the Japanese version, which reads "content judged to be obscene," and the English version, which reads "contains pornography" — and the final call is left to Amazon. It's safer not to read the wording in your own favor, and to decide against using any image or wording you're unsure about. For the legal application of portrait and publicity rights, or of obscenity, consult a lawyer or other qualified professional before publishing.

If you receive a notice: identify the type and decide how to respond
STEP 1. Confirm the notice is legitimate, then write out its key elements
KDP never asks for your password or bank account details by email or phone, so if an email looks suspicious, don't open its links — sign in directly at the KDP site to check instead. Notice wording varies by situation, so write out the following elements to organize what you're dealing with:
- The book affected (title, and whether it's the eBook or the print edition)
- The guideline section cited as the reason
- The response requested (a fix, submitting documents, etc.) and whether there's a deadline
- How to reply or file an appeal

STEP 2. Sort out the scope of impact and what to do by notice type
| Notice or status | Scope of impact | What to do first |
|---|---|---|
| A "Quality Notice" email | The eBook in question | Open the Quality Notice dashboard from your Bookshelf and check what was flagged. If you fix it, re-upload the corrected file (Help states review generally takes up to 3 business days); if the flag doesn't apply, select "Not an Issue" on the dashboard |
| A request for additional rights-verification documents | A book that hasn't gone on sale yet | Submit documents showing you hold the rights needed to publish (Help states you'll typically hear back within 5 business days of submission) |
| Bookshelf status "Blocked" | The book in question (can't be published or edited) | Check which guideline applies, then contact KDP through Help |
| Book removed for a metadata violation, etc. | The book in question | Check the reason and fix it. If you believe the decision was wrong, appeal |
| An identity verification request | Publishing features (unavailable until completed) | Complete the process by the deadline using a government-issued ID or similar document |
| Termination of the agreement (account closure) | The entire account | Organize the facts and consider an appeal (see next section) |
The timeframes in the table are general guidance from Help and may change. If identity verification isn't completed by the deadline, Amazon may take measures such as restricting your publishing features or closing your account.
A termination notice has serious consequences
KDP Terms Section 3 provides that Amazon can terminate the agreement at any time, for example when it has concerns about your account or your activity, and that notice is given after termination. The notice is also said to explain the steps for appealing if you believe the termination was a mistake. If the account is terminated for reasons such as a guidelines violation, you forfeit any unpaid royalties (Section 5.4.8), and an applicant whose use has been terminated may not open a new account (Section 4.2).
If you receive a termination notice, write out the notice elements listed in STEP 1 above and cross-check them against your creation log for the books cited as the reason, to organize the facts. Because publishing under a different account isn't allowed under the Terms, focus your response on filing an appeal for this account.
The order for rebuilding in line with the Terms
STEP 1. Cross-check your creation log against the notice
For the book that was flagged, check your creation log against how each part was made, whether the disclosure matched reality, and where the problem might lie among rights, disclosure, or quality. If you have other books made the same way, check those too.
STEP 2. Consider unpublishing a problem book yourself
For a book you've confirmed has a problem, you can stop new-copy sales by selecting Unpublish (出版を停止) from the "…" menu next to that book on your Bookshelf (本棚) (Help states this can take up to 72 hours to take effect). Even after unpublishing, a third party may still be able to sell used copies. "Delete Book" applies only to unpublished drafts, and deletion cannot be undone.
STEP 3. Republish as a corrected or new edition
For small changes, you can update the book by uploading a revised manuscript; for major changes, such as adding new chapters, you're directed to publish it as a new edition. Republishing is also subject to AI disclosure, so review your disclosure to match your corrected production method.
That said, avoid republishing a book that was Blocked or removed as a supposedly different book, by changing only details such as the title or cover without actually resolving the underlying problem. The quality guide also lists content that has been rebranded and re-released with heavily changed metadata as an example that doesn't meet reader expectations.
STEP 4. Build your appeal around the facts, the cause, the fix, and prevention
The guidelines state that if a book is removed, you'll receive a notice, and that you can appeal that decision. Follow the steps and deadlines given in the notice.
If you believe the decision was wrong, provide supporting documentation; if you accept there was a problem, lay out the specific cause, what you corrected, and how you'll prevent it from happening again. The example below assumes, purely for illustration, that AI-generated illustrations were published without being disclosed — it is not an actual case. Rewrite it, including the parts in parentheses, to match your own facts.
The illustrations in Chapters 2 through 4 of the book in question were created with an image-generation AI, but because I adjusted the colors and composition afterward, I mistakenly judged that disclosure wasn't required.
I have since unpublished the book, compiled a list of how each illustration was produced, and checked whether they resemble any existing images using image search (state the specific results of that check here). When I republish the corrected edition, I will disclose the relevant illustrations as AI-generated content.
Going forward, I will record the production method for each part and whether disclosure is required in my creation log, and cross-check it against my disclosure before submitting.
A boilerplate statement doesn't convey what happened or what you changed. For the mindset behind writing something specific, Building an Amazon Plan of Action and Tailoring an Amazon Plan of Action to your business, both written for selling accounts, are also useful references.

Responses to avoid
- Creating another account to keep publishing: The Terms allow you to hold only one account.
- Disclosing AI use in a way that doesn't match reality: Don't conveniently tell yourself "I edited it, so disclosure isn't needed."
- Forging or altering rights-verification documents: Submitting a document that doesn't reflect the facts only makes the problem bigger. If you don't have a document, explain honestly that you don't have it.
Frequently asked questions
Q. I've realized the AI disclosure on a book I already published doesn't match reality.
A. Public Help doesn't describe a way to fix only the disclosure, so contact KDP to ask about the process. It's also worth checking your creation log for the same mistake in any other books.
Q. Do I own the copyright in a book I made with AI?
A. Output from a simple instruction alone is unlikely to be recognized as a copyrighted work, while parts you've added to or edited yourself are more likely to be (see Checkpoint 1 for details). To find out how far you can claim ownership, show the extent of your edits from your creation log and check with a qualified professional.
Q. Does a KDP suspension affect my selling account too?
A. We haven't found an official explanation of how a suspension on one affects the other. Don't guess — respond based on each dashboard and the content of the notice you actually received.
Q. When will I hear back on an appeal, and how many times can I appeal?
A. The deadline, the number of appeals allowed, and the review period aren't stated in public information. Follow the steps and deadline in the notice, and keep a record of when you sent your appeal and what you included.
Summary
Publishing an AI-generated book on KDP is not itself prohibited, but it requires disclosure and compliance with the guidelines as a whole.
- If AI actually created the content, it's "AI-generated" even after heavy editing. Judge each part separately and record it in your creation log
- Before publishing, check the five checkpoints: rights, disclosure, quality, mass production, and account
- For AI-model photo books, pay particular attention to sexual content, anything resembling a minor, resemblance to real people, and using someone else's photo as input
- Confirm a notice is legitimate, and sort out the scope and the response by notice type
- Think through rebuilding in this order — unpublish, republish a corrected edition, then a fact-based appeal — and don't create another account
If you're unsure how to read a notice or how to approach an appeal, consider gathering your creation log and the notice together and consulting a qualified professional sooner rather than later.
Need help with an AI book or KDP suspension?
We'll assess your prospects for reinstatement at no cost. Consultations are free, as often as you need.
*This article provides a general explanation. The appropriate response in individual cases depends on the circumstances.


